The Management of Expert Evidence for use by Courts and Tribunals: Concurrent Expert Evidence
Gaetano Pagone
Zitiervorschlag: Gaetano Pagone, The Management of Expert Evidence for use by Courts and Tribunals: Concurrent Expert Evidence, in: «Justice - Justiz - Giustizia» 2015/4
The purpose of this paper is to raise issues for discussion about the use of non-legal expert knowledge and skills in judicial decisions. The topics chosen in the paper are intended to be some which arise in all jurisdictions, although they may be known differently in different jurisdictions and the topics themselves may overlap in different ways. The intention is for the paper to spark discussion and debate about the general issues raised by a consideration of the topics.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
A. Objectives
B. Expert Evidence
C. Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Judicial Proceedings
What
Who
D. The Expert’s Duty of Independence
Selection
Payment
Preparation of report
E. Role of the Court in Gathering Expert Evidence
F. Identification of the Questions for the Expert
G. Intellectual Basis of Expert Opinion
H. Concurrent Evidence
Management of concurrent evidence
I. Special assessors and deliberations between judge and expert in camera
Appendix A (Pre-Checkliste)
Appendix B (Practice Note CM 7)
Appendix C (Rules 2005)
Appendix D (Guidelines)
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.
Hier können Sie Meinung zu diesem Thema hinterlassen. Wir behalten uns vor, Kommentare zu entfernen, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstossen.
Es gibt noch keine Kommentare zu diesem Thema.
Jurius ist dein persönlicher Assistent für alle Fragen rund um Weblaw. Egal ob du Informationen zu Abos, Produkten oder Dienstleistungen benötigst, Jurius ist hier, um dir zu helfen. Stelle einfach deine Frage und erhalte sofortige Antworten.
