Politics and Judges: Improving Judicial Decision-making
Based on a fundamental study by Ryan Malphurs, «Rhetoric and Discourse in [US] Supreme Court Oral Arguments», the present article will give recommendations based upon conclusions of US-studies of judicial decision-making, thus contributing to the actual discussion of the judicial selection process in Switzerland.
Table of contents
- 1. Status quo
- 2. Models of Judicial Decision-making
- 3. Judicial Philosophies in the United States
- 4. Supreme Court Review Process
- 5. Common Models of Judicial Decision-making in United States
- 6. Sensemaking, Judicial Sensemaking, & lessons from U.S. Supreme Court
- 7. Judicial Sensemaking
- 8. Deliberative and Biased Sensemaking at United States Supreme Court
- 9. Deliberative Sensemaking
- 10. Biased Sensemaking
- 11. Dangers of Biased Judicial Sensemaking
- 12. Conclusions for the decision-making process of judges in Switzerland
- 13. Appointment of judges
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.