The Management of Expert Evidence for use by Courts and Tribunals: Concurrent Expert Evidence
Gaetano Pagone
Proposition de citation: Gaetano Pagone, The Management of Expert Evidence for use by Courts and Tribunals: Concurrent Expert Evidence, in : «Justice - Justiz - Giustizia» 2015/4
The purpose of this paper is to raise issues for discussion about the use of non-legal expert knowledge and skills in judicial decisions. The topics chosen in the paper are intended to be some which arise in all jurisdictions, although they may be known differently in different jurisdictions and the topics themselves may overlap in different ways. The intention is for the paper to spark discussion and debate about the general issues raised by a consideration of the topics.
Table des matières
A. Objectives
B. Expert Evidence
C. Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Judicial Proceedings
What
Who
D. The Expert’s Duty of Independence
Selection
Payment
Preparation of report
E. Role of the Court in Gathering Expert Evidence
F. Identification of the Questions for the Expert
G. Intellectual Basis of Expert Opinion
H. Concurrent Evidence
Management of concurrent evidence
I. Special assessors and deliberations between judge and expert in camera
Appendix A (Pre-Checkliste)
Appendix B (Practice Note CM 7)
Appendix C (Rules 2005)
Appendix D (Guidelines)
Veuillez vous connecter pour lire le texte complet.
Ici, vous pouvez laisser votre avis sur ce sujet. Nous nous réservons le droit de supprimer les commentaires qui ne respectent pas nos règles.
Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires sur ce sujet.
Jurius est votre assistant personnel pour toutes les questions concernant Weblaw. Que vous ayez besoin d'informations sur les abonnements, les produits ou les services, Jurius est là pour vous aider. Posez simplement votre question et obtenez immédiatement des réponses.
